<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll Position Vs. TNA &#8211; Impact (11/19/2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/</link>
	<description>Wrestling news, rumors, reviews and commentary, from WWE to TNA to ROH and everything in between...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:09:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15192</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15192</guid>
		<description>One of the better features I&#039;ve seen on here for a while (and I&#039;m a big fan of the site) so well done for that.  I spent two hours on a coach last week trying to work out what I&#039;d have as a Wrestlemania line up (Bryan Danielson vs Chris Jericho anyone?) so it&#039;s something we all love doing.

Don&#039;t like the idea of splitting up MCMG as the one area which TNA batters the WWE is tag team action.  MCMG are the most dynamic tag team on the roster and the longer they are together, the better it can be for TNA.  If WWE though came out and did something massive with the tag teams then things may change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the better features I&#8217;ve seen on here for a while (and I&#8217;m a big fan of the site) so well done for that.  I spent two hours on a coach last week trying to work out what I&#8217;d have as a Wrestlemania line up (Bryan Danielson vs Chris Jericho anyone?) so it&#8217;s something we all love doing.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t like the idea of splitting up MCMG as the one area which TNA batters the WWE is tag team action.  MCMG are the most dynamic tag team on the roster and the longer they are together, the better it can be for TNA.  If WWE though came out and did something massive with the tag teams then things may change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Mahony</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15174</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Mahony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15174</guid>
		<description>I feel the same way about you and comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the same way about you and comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15171</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15171</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’ve never tried to write a promo before,&quot;

...and you should never try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ve never tried to write a promo before,&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;and you should never try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott m</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15160</link>
		<dc:creator>scott m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15160</guid>
		<description>Spectacle? Not to hear the wrestlers talk about it.

I mean, yes, it&#039;s flash paper. POOF! Big pyrotechnics. But it&#039;s still fire. Burns hair, skin and reportedly hurts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spectacle? Not to hear the wrestlers talk about it.</p>
<p>I mean, yes, it&#8217;s flash paper. POOF! Big pyrotechnics. But it&#8217;s still fire. Burns hair, skin and reportedly hurts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Mahony</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15150</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Mahony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15150</guid>
		<description>Hmm...interesting point on the Daffney angle. I suppose calling it an accident and shooting it in such a way that you don&#039;t actually see her getting burned would work. I mean, the fireball trick is more spectacle than anything else anyway. I think I&#039;ll just take a slap on the wrist from Spike and then show them the ratings a couple months later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;interesting point on the Daffney angle. I suppose calling it an accident and shooting it in such a way that you don&#8217;t actually see her getting burned would work. I mean, the fireball trick is more spectacle than anything else anyway. I think I&#8217;ll just take a slap on the wrist from Spike and then show them the ratings a couple months later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Manuel</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15147</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15147</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this quite a bit. All I&#039;m gonna say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this quite a bit. All I&#8217;m gonna say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kromadas</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15140</link>
		<dc:creator>kromadas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15140</guid>
		<description>Only one thing I&#039;m wondering about. The fireball incident with Daphne. Obviously you are working a big angle involving Foley, but I&#039;m not sure Spike TV brass would allow it as it&#039;s technically man on woman violence which they don&#039;t allow to be shown. Other than that, I like what I see thus far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only one thing I&#8217;m wondering about. The fireball incident with Daphne. Obviously you are working a big angle involving Foley, but I&#8217;m not sure Spike TV brass would allow it as it&#8217;s technically man on woman violence which they don&#8217;t allow to be shown. Other than that, I like what I see thus far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott m</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15138</link>
		<dc:creator>scott m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15138</guid>
		<description>Bonus points if you make Nigel&#039;s inexplicable name change and the resulting feud with Kong over Nigel failing to pay Kong child support.

Makes the alter-ego Desmond Wolfe logical. As well as Kong wanting to beat his face in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonus points if you make Nigel&#8217;s inexplicable name change and the resulting feud with Kong over Nigel failing to pay Kong child support.</p>
<p>Makes the alter-ego Desmond Wolfe logical. As well as Kong wanting to beat his face in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott m</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15137</link>
		<dc:creator>scott m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15137</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re selling yourself short, Michael. Especially with McGuinness.

Why couldn&#039;t you have Awesome Kong come out and say she has a love child with Desmond Wolfe. And then have her reveal that his REAL NAME is Nigel McGuinness.

And then start a blood feud between Kong and Nigel.

It wouldn&#039;t be any worse than what Russo has already subjected us to. The TNA faithful might actually respond with Pavlovian joy.

And it might garner some new viewers when the slower ROHbots figure out that McGuinness is actually on TNA. And has been for a while.

Have Angle intervene in the Kong/Nigel feud, by professing his love for her and then BAM!

We&#039;re back to Angle/Nigel, as it should&#039;ve been.

Heck, Russo could do all that IN ONE SHOW!

How can we mere mortals compete?

And if there&#039;s any question, I jest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re selling yourself short, Michael. Especially with McGuinness.</p>
<p>Why couldn&#8217;t you have Awesome Kong come out and say she has a love child with Desmond Wolfe. And then have her reveal that his REAL NAME is Nigel McGuinness.</p>
<p>And then start a blood feud between Kong and Nigel.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be any worse than what Russo has already subjected us to. The TNA faithful might actually respond with Pavlovian joy.</p>
<p>And it might garner some new viewers when the slower ROHbots figure out that McGuinness is actually on TNA. And has been for a while.</p>
<p>Have Angle intervene in the Kong/Nigel feud, by professing his love for her and then BAM!</p>
<p>We&#8217;re back to Angle/Nigel, as it should&#8217;ve been.</p>
<p>Heck, Russo could do all that IN ONE SHOW!</p>
<p>How can we mere mortals compete?</p>
<p>And if there&#8217;s any question, I jest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Mahony</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15136</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Mahony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15136</guid>
		<description>I probably don&#039;t have time to do an awful lot of gimmick-changing given that I&#039;m only booking a little over a month of shows. There&#039;s one gimmick change I&#039;m definitely doing, and it&#039;s probably obvious what that is. Other than that, it&#039;s really an attempt to show what could potentially be done in a very short space of time to make the product better. Given that those of us who read the spoilers already know what TNA&#039;s doing for most of that period, I&#039;m not sure how I can fail, but if anything, reading that just depressed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably don&#8217;t have time to do an awful lot of gimmick-changing given that I&#8217;m only booking a little over a month of shows. There&#8217;s one gimmick change I&#8217;m definitely doing, and it&#8217;s probably obvious what that is. Other than that, it&#8217;s really an attempt to show what could potentially be done in a very short space of time to make the product better. Given that those of us who read the spoilers already know what TNA&#8217;s doing for most of that period, I&#8217;m not sure how I can fail, but if anything, reading that just depressed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anime Saito</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15135</link>
		<dc:creator>Anime Saito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15135</guid>
		<description>Nash i great and TNA Rocks. Thanks for this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nash i great and TNA Rocks. Thanks for this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott m</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15133</link>
		<dc:creator>scott m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15133</guid>
		<description>Also...

One of the big problems with TNA is that the established guys really AREN&#039;T getting the new guys over.

Angle could (and should have) made a star with Samoa Joe.

Sting could have made stars out of Styles, Daniels or both.

Whether or not Foley, Hogan, Nash and Sting put asses in seats is secondary to them not getting the young guys to the point where they can. At least at this point in TNA&#039;s lifecycle.

Look at how new stars have been established historically. Not by having Styles and Daniels on the same PPV as a Sting vs. Hogan match. Historically, new stars have been established by stepping toe-to-toe with existing stars. And being shown to be of a comparable skill level. Reference Kofi Kingston vs. Randy Orton from last Monday&#039;s Raw for just the latest in a very long history of building stars through good booking.

Foley became a star by fighting the Undertaker, not Doink the Clown. Cena became a star fighting HHH, not Shelton Benjamin. DiBiase became a star (initially) by fighting Dory Funk Jr. and Jack Brisco. Then again with a feud against Hacksaw Duggan. Lawler became a star by feuding with Jackie Fargo, the top face in Memphis for over a decade.

But TNA continually thinks that they can make Joe, Styles and Daniels stars by having them wrestle each other and get buried by the established guys. Or by not giving them clean wins.

History doesn&#039;t bear this out.

TNA needs to break its dependency on stars made *outside* of TNA. And start focusing on establishing its brand with stars from inside their organization.

Michael seems to be wanting to do that, so thumbs up for him.

Also, changing Nigel McGuinness&#039; name was seriously dropping the ball. Anyone tuning in to TNA to see Samoa Joe has likely heard of Nigel McGuinness -- even if they might not recognize him on sight.

Anyway you can build an angle to change it back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also&#8230;</p>
<p>One of the big problems with TNA is that the established guys really AREN&#8217;T getting the new guys over.</p>
<p>Angle could (and should have) made a star with Samoa Joe.</p>
<p>Sting could have made stars out of Styles, Daniels or both.</p>
<p>Whether or not Foley, Hogan, Nash and Sting put asses in seats is secondary to them not getting the young guys to the point where they can. At least at this point in TNA&#8217;s lifecycle.</p>
<p>Look at how new stars have been established historically. Not by having Styles and Daniels on the same PPV as a Sting vs. Hogan match. Historically, new stars have been established by stepping toe-to-toe with existing stars. And being shown to be of a comparable skill level. Reference Kofi Kingston vs. Randy Orton from last Monday&#8217;s Raw for just the latest in a very long history of building stars through good booking.</p>
<p>Foley became a star by fighting the Undertaker, not Doink the Clown. Cena became a star fighting HHH, not Shelton Benjamin. DiBiase became a star (initially) by fighting Dory Funk Jr. and Jack Brisco. Then again with a feud against Hacksaw Duggan. Lawler became a star by feuding with Jackie Fargo, the top face in Memphis for over a decade.</p>
<p>But TNA continually thinks that they can make Joe, Styles and Daniels stars by having them wrestle each other and get buried by the established guys. Or by not giving them clean wins.</p>
<p>History doesn&#8217;t bear this out.</p>
<p>TNA needs to break its dependency on stars made *outside* of TNA. And start focusing on establishing its brand with stars from inside their organization.</p>
<p>Michael seems to be wanting to do that, so thumbs up for him.</p>
<p>Also, changing Nigel McGuinness&#8217; name was seriously dropping the ball. Anyone tuning in to TNA to see Samoa Joe has likely heard of Nigel McGuinness &#8212; even if they might not recognize him on sight.</p>
<p>Anyway you can build an angle to change it back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Mahony</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15132</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Mahony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15132</guid>
		<description>I get that, but Hogan isn&#039;t even on TV and it&#039;s already overkill. Fans at Turning Point were chanting &quot;Screw Hulk Hogan&quot; and he hasn&#039;t even made an appearance yet. Of course it makes logical sense to use established names to get younger guys over, but you don&#039;t shove those established names down people&#039;s throats at the expense of guys who are here and working, not touring Australia. That hurts everybody. As I said at the top of the column, consider that the Hogan vignettes are there and that my TNA is certainly announcing his arrival and would (if I was to book that far) make a big deal out of him. But I&#039;m not going to do what TNA is apparently doing and already building half the show around an absent character. That&#039;s just dumb. I will continue to make use of Nash, Foley, and Sting, even though I don&#039;t like any of them, because that&#039;s what I&#039;d do if I was running TNA, for exactly the reasons you state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that, but Hogan isn&#8217;t even on TV and it&#8217;s already overkill. Fans at Turning Point were chanting &#8220;Screw Hulk Hogan&#8221; and he hasn&#8217;t even made an appearance yet. Of course it makes logical sense to use established names to get younger guys over, but you don&#8217;t shove those established names down people&#8217;s throats at the expense of guys who are here and working, not touring Australia. That hurts everybody. As I said at the top of the column, consider that the Hogan vignettes are there and that my TNA is certainly announcing his arrival and would (if I was to book that far) make a big deal out of him. But I&#8217;m not going to do what TNA is apparently doing and already building half the show around an absent character. That&#8217;s just dumb. I will continue to make use of Nash, Foley, and Sting, even though I don&#8217;t like any of them, because that&#8217;s what I&#8217;d do if I was running TNA, for exactly the reasons you state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Reekers</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15129</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Reekers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15129</guid>
		<description>TNA has to utilise Hogan properly. Yes he is in a outside of the ring capacity. But just imagine the mileage they could get out of him just building up to a big match. The Legends title division looks a lot tasty now. I mean Mick Foley, Kevin Nash, Hulk Hogan and Sting. yes none of these apart from probably Sting are capable of really going and he doesn&#039;t seem committed at the moment. But these guys put bums on seats FACT! Fans tune in and buy PPV&#039;s to watch these guys and they catch AJ Styles, Joe, Daniels, Wolfe all headlining. Thus you create new stars. You simply can&#039;t just have AJ Styles and whoever going at it, because the casual fan doesn&#039;t care about them like they care about the established stars. Then they just happen to see these guys in action, embroiled in a deep feud and new stars are born. Kerching!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TNA has to utilise Hogan properly. Yes he is in a outside of the ring capacity. But just imagine the mileage they could get out of him just building up to a big match. The Legends title division looks a lot tasty now. I mean Mick Foley, Kevin Nash, Hulk Hogan and Sting. yes none of these apart from probably Sting are capable of really going and he doesn&#8217;t seem committed at the moment. But these guys put bums on seats FACT! Fans tune in and buy PPV&#8217;s to watch these guys and they catch AJ Styles, Joe, Daniels, Wolfe all headlining. Thus you create new stars. You simply can&#8217;t just have AJ Styles and whoever going at it, because the casual fan doesn&#8217;t care about them like they care about the established stars. Then they just happen to see these guys in action, embroiled in a deep feud and new stars are born. Kerching!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott m</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15126</link>
		<dc:creator>scott m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15126</guid>
		<description>Agreed regarding dialogue. Only modern &quot;creatives&quot; write scripts for the wrestlers.

I&#039;d prefer a format comparable to a trimmed down version of the &quot;Sting interview&quot;.

Remember, back in the day, promoters/bookers would just tell a wrestler the setup for the promo and how much time they had.

No need to type them word-for-word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed regarding dialogue. Only modern &#8220;creatives&#8221; write scripts for the wrestlers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer a format comparable to a trimmed down version of the &#8220;Sting interview&#8221;.</p>
<p>Remember, back in the day, promoters/bookers would just tell a wrestler the setup for the promo and how much time they had.</p>
<p>No need to type them word-for-word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The sheet</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15122</link>
		<dc:creator>The sheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15122</guid>
		<description>maybe you could just give up the main points the performer should hit in the dialogue section, i had to slip over entire sections as it felt like you were typing an impression of the character. A bullet point system would suffice i think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe you could just give up the main points the performer should hit in the dialogue section, i had to slip over entire sections as it felt like you were typing an impression of the character. A bullet point system would suffice i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Mahony</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15118</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Mahony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15118</guid>
		<description>Agreed on the dialogue. I&#039;ve never tried to write a promo before, so hopefully I&#039;ll get better at it as I go along. As to the Nash thing, I just wanted to bury that dipshit angle and move on. This was always going to be the toughest show to do, because it&#039;s the one where I had to compromise the most with TNA&#039;s storylines. I&#039;m not going to do ANY storyline involving Hogan since he&#039;s not even active in the promotion yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed on the dialogue. I&#8217;ve never tried to write a promo before, so hopefully I&#8217;ll get better at it as I go along. As to the Nash thing, I just wanted to bury that dipshit angle and move on. This was always going to be the toughest show to do, because it&#8217;s the one where I had to compromise the most with TNA&#8217;s storylines. I&#8217;m not going to do ANY storyline involving Hogan since he&#8217;s not even active in the promotion yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/18/poll-position-vs-tna-impact-11192009/comment-page-1/#comment-15117</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/?p=94341#comment-15117</guid>
		<description>I like the booking but the dialog is iffy. I get the idea you&#039;re trying to get across though. Is Rob Terry the big dude from the BI? Not too sure about that whole thing. 

The two finishes I might change are the Rhino match (Rhino wins after 3D-terference, who come out after a few near-falls are a bit too close for comfort) and the AJ/Joe match. AJ should still go-over, but maybe with a schoolboy or small package rather than the clash. I might save the clash finish for either a squash later on or the PPV. 

Just my own goofy arm-chair suggestions, but nice article nonetheless. Looking forward to seeing where it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the booking but the dialog is iffy. I get the idea you&#8217;re trying to get across though. Is Rob Terry the big dude from the BI? Not too sure about that whole thing. </p>
<p>The two finishes I might change are the Rhino match (Rhino wins after 3D-terference, who come out after a few near-falls are a bit too close for comfort) and the AJ/Joe match. AJ should still go-over, but maybe with a schoolboy or small package rather than the clash. I might save the clash finish for either a squash later on or the PPV. </p>
<p>Just my own goofy arm-chair suggestions, but nice article nonetheless. Looking forward to seeing where it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
