TCWNN#18: TNA Monday Retro.
by Chris Morgado on January 8, 2010

Well that was an exciting Monday, now wasn’t it?

And by exciting, I mean underwhelming. On both sides.

Sure, there was an air of excitement over having a second wrestling show to flip over to. In that respect, it certainly did feel like the Monday Night Wars. A lot of people seem to be letting the night slide by on that alone. And sure, Jeff Hardy making what can only be described as a bone headed maneuver (whether on his own part for possibly burning his bridge with the only real game in town, or on the part of TNA for hiring a guy with an uncertain legal status, you decide) was exciting. Kind of. But for the most part, neither company delivered excitement. Mostly, they delivered a whole lot of same old same old and been there done that.

It should shock no one that I’m going to deal with the WWE first, as they obviously deserve a shorter and lighter tongue lashing, for one reason and one reason alone: the Shawn Michaels/Bret Hart confrontation was everything it needed to be.  A spectacular video package that clued in even the most uninformed viewer as to the history of Bret Hart, the Montreal Screwjob, and the historical importance of what we were about to see.  A face to face confrontation that was full of emotion, gave the audience closure, and hopefully put to bed any demand for a Bret/HBK match.  I daresay this first 20 minutes alone was better than a single solitary segment put forth by TNA in their whole 3 hours.  That it did not deliver in the ratings as well as expected is probably more a testament to the current state of wrestling overall than anything TNA did (tho according to reports, the Raw rating nearly doubled it’s usual in Canada).

The rest of Raw, however, was the same old same old. Not a bad Raw, by any means, nor anywhere close to some of the televised abortions that have been presented in the past few months. But, tellingly, they didn’t go out of their way to do anything shocking or exciting to combat TNA (Hart’s return having been reported as having been in the works well in advance of the announcement of TNA’s “opening salvo”).

And of course, there was the end of the show. The Vince McMahon/Hitman face off. To say that this failed to give the audience what they wanted to see (most likely Bret punching Vince in the face) would be an understatement. However, given that the rumored plan is for some sort of Bret/Vince street fight at Wrestlemania, having Vince reopen the old wounds by screwing Bret over on his apology was an understandable choice. It just wasn’t an exciting one. More like anticlimactic.

And then, there’s TNA.

Let me get this out of the way right now, the show did what it needed to do: it brought in ratings. Not great ratings, mind you, just ratings that were great for TNA, and for what was expected for TNA. In that regard, it can’t be called anything but a victory.

But.

This was a show that was mind numbingly, insultingly bad. It’s no wonder that the ratings peaked with Hulk Hogan’s 9pm appearance and then steadily dropped- if I was a casual fan who had been brought to the table with the promise of Hulk Hogan, or one who bought into their claim of providing actual WRESTLING, all I would have motivated to do after that first hour was see the Hulkster and then change the damn channel. Every thing that has ever made Impact a torture to try and watch was in abundant display. And worst of all, for a show called Total Nonstop Action, that straight out promised wrestling, there was almost no ACTION.

In the first hour especially, the wrestling was nowhere to be found.  A three hour show, and we didn’t even get 45 combined minutes of wrestling. On a show that started by showing rabid fans demanding wrestling. On a show whose announcers were promising WRESTLING. Angle vs. Styles was a fun 20 minute match that kept me watching, but not only did it come out of the blue at the end of the show (when it was too late to be a draw for hour one viewers, you know that UNOPPOSED hour that TNA chucked out the window?), one match does not actual wrestling make.

I’ve seen people claiming that this was a “facelift” for TNA, that the program was “fresh” and introduced “well needed new faces”?!?  I would love to know what alternate reality TNA they were watching. The N.W.O infighting while the Nasty Boys run around eating donuts off the floor and Val Venis (shhh don‘t call him that) sits in his towel and plays strip poker with girls (that we know aren‘t actually going to strip, because we saw it in the WWE already) is not fresh, it’s a nostalgia act.  Having your main angle be a rehash of the New Blood angle from the last days of WCW is not “fresh” by any stretch of the imagination either (in fact, wasn’t TNA literally JUST doing a rehash of the Millionaires Club/New Blood routine?).  The only fresh thing TNA actually had going for it was Jeff Hardy showing up unexpectedly, yet even that was hampered by the disastrous cage match that occurred seconds before, and by the fact that they treated possibly the biggest baby face star of the past 2 years like he was just another guy.

The influx of all these unnecessary players is extra frustrating for another reason: TNA has never needed fresh faces. One thing TNA has always had going for it over the WWE is better potential for stars to come out of their mid card. Potential they squander by running to the ex-WWE well over and over and over rather than focusing on their own guys. Beer Money only made it on this show so they could be punked out off camera. The British Invasion are the company tag team champions, they were nowhere to be found. Eric Young? He made it on tv for a fifth of a second so that Ric Flair would have another hand to shake. AJ Styles was barely even mentioned unless it was to point out that Ric Flair went into his dressing room, and he’s the WORLD CHAMPION. It’s ridiculous how little a show that played so much lip service to the young guys, couldn’t be bothered to focus on the young guys.

Even if the home grown talent was mentioned on screen, they did virtually nothing to introduce them to the audience. Sure some guys got a mention or two. But at the end of the show, unless you already knew a guy from the WWE or WCW, you didn’t know anything about them.  Say what you want about the quality of Raw last night, if you tuned in and saw Seamus or The Miz, they absolutely made sure you knew what each guys deal was.

For all the talk on the show about TNA being about the young guys, and how we’re going to get wrestling instead of sports entertainment, and how they’re going to be the number one company in the world… this show didn’t do a damn thing to make any of those statements look possible, let alone truthful. What we got looked like an attempt to pick up right where the WWE lite era of WCW had left off. A  show full of nostalgia acts it could of been called TNA Monday Retro. Speaking as someone who wants to see an viable alternative to the WWE, that’s not exciting.

That’s just disappointing.


Tags: , , , , , ,

Related News Articles

more articles »

WWE Over the Limit PPV Final Advertised Card for Sunday's Show

WWE Superstars React To Raw Going To 3-Hours

Official Press Release: TNA Signs Brooke Hogan In An Executive Role

New 3-Hour Raw Will Be Interactive
  • Observer

    I have to disagree with the OP (original poster).

    First, Jeff Hardy was NOT exciting. While his appearance was unexpected to viewers (non-internet wrestling website readers). Hardy didn’t do anything significant in his appearance, and his in ring skills are are nothing special. (Except for the heavy set out of shape wrestlers the TNA talent can do every move he does, and many – like AJ Styles – are far superior to Hardy in wrestling talent).

    Second, while the Bret Hart appearance drew viewers it shouldn’t be called better than TNA’s entire show. Bret’s scripting dialogue didn’t do anything revolutionary, and those who missed it wouldn’t know they missing anything since it didn’t change the way WWE or wrestling will be in the future (not much would). I will agree with you that aside from having Bret Hart talk in the ring the night was not significantly different from any other run of the mill RAW that has occurred for years. Viewers were still force fed the same wrestlers fighting each other with the same match stipulations that we see week after week, and month after month ad-nauseum.

    Counter to what you said (OP) I do believe the Bret Hart / Shawn Michaels segment drew viewers that in turn lowered the rating TNA would have otherwise had during that time segment.

    TNA did have surprise appearances continually throughout the night, and you can’t say the same about WWE.

    TNA (nor anyone else) is going to change wrestling in one night. They have to lay the ground work, and create a story (ex: old vs new, hardworking vs lazy, old talet vs new talent). They started that last night, and now they can build on that story. In the meantime you look at the WWE and they have no overall premise or storyline to their show(s), and what little storyline they do have is based around their titles. WWE’s story is the same regardless of who holds their belts and hasn’t changed since AOL ruined WCW.

    You wine about matches not being long enough, but they were plenty long enough. If the Styles vs Angle match had been any longer it would have been to long. When matches get too long they become boring and/or stale.

    TNA left us with unanswered questions, and make me want to see what happens next. I can’t say the same about WWE. The only thing in WWE that has mystery is the Royal Rumble, and with that they’ll likely gag us by trying to shove the no talent John Cena down our throats.

  • incognito

    Nicely written, Observer.

  • cristos

    I love how people constantly complain about wanting more wrestling, when the business only took off with the vignettes and the backstage drama that TNA was showing off on Monday. Also, about the comparison between the New Blood vs. Millionaire’s Club angle and the recent Main Event Mafia vs. Frontline conflict, the TNA angle was missing some star power on both ends, and hopefully Hogan and co. will give the rub to some of TNA’s homegrown talent. Like it or not, Angle is not believable as a master mind heel character but Hogan and co. are, hopefully it will work this time.

  • incognito

    It wasn’t so much the vignettes and overplayed “oh my this person was laid out backstage” that brought the ratings or WWE or TNA would have a spike in ratings whenever they run those types of angles, which is very often. The big names and even more so the heavy promotion that they have been lacking up to this point increased awareness of the product. A lot of the big names they brought in before were nearly pointless because unless fans already knew about TNA, they didn’t know about the big name coming in. This time TNA advertised and promoted the right way and it paid off. Unfortunately, because of a sloppily booked first hour, they lost more viewers than they needed to.

    While Hogan can help draw as one of the faces of the company, hopefully they won’t be over-reliant on Hogan’s crew of buddies because not one of them can perform up to the necessary level to carry a main event program at this point, they are all too broken down and once the curiosity factor is gone they may leave TNA worse off than they started.

Blowing Up Blogs

Recent Comments

Search Pulse

Author:

Zone:

Category:

wwe
tna
So, with this Simple Jquery Modal Window, it can be in any shapes you want! Simple and Easy to modify : )