DR. TNA: Why I Watch TNA Wrestling (and why you should too)
by David Roberts on June 18, 2010

If you are a regular reader to Inside Pulse Wrestling and have clicked on this story, I suspect you probably did it with two questions in mind:

1) Who is David Roberts?

2) Why is he watching TNA?

I’m not offended so don’t worry.  I am brand new to this site so you have every reason to wonder why you do not recognize my name.  Also, judging by the previous head to head ratings, odds are if you are a wrestling fan, you prefer WWE.  If you are not a wrestling fan, you think TNA is referring to something other than professional wrestling.

When the good folks here asked me to begin writing this column, I believe the preceding thought process likely went something like this:

I feel like to ensure we are fully covering professional wrestling, someone should do a regular column on TNA.  Are there any volunteers?…….No?……Well let’s find some poor sucker from the outside.  Hey, doesn’t Roberts watch TNA?  I bet he would do it.

Again, this doesn’t offend me.  I get it.  The cool kids are watching Raw these days.  However, let me explain why I started watching TNA, why I continue to watch it, and why I think you owe it to yourself to give it a shot.

I am that guy that the professional wrestling purists, and especially the WWE homers, absolutely hate.  I tuned into TNA late.  I watched a random episode here or there, but it was when they brought in Hogan and Bischoff that I set TNA in my DVR.

Yes, I’ll admit it now.  I tuned in for Hogan.  I was intrigued by Bischoff.  I openly cheered the thought of the Band reuniting – Hall, Nash, 6-pac.  I was that guy.

Go ahead, scream your obscenities, but please read a bit further.

I tuned in for those guys because I loved watching in the old WCW.  However, once I did, they weren’t the ones who held my attention.  During the first episode I watched, I saw Kurt Angle vs AJ Styles and Desmond Wolfe vs the Pope.  Despite my original reasons for watching, it was these matches that really held my interest.

Don’t get me wrong, despite his physical slide, I was disappointed to see Scott Hall being released.  I also still love to hear Hogan’s music start up and I am sincerely hoping Kevin Nash eventually is able to stop jobbing to everyone from the rookies to the pop corn guy.  However, it’s the overall mix of talent that keeps me coming back.

My favorite segment in Thursday’s show was Jay Lethal on the mic going toe to toe with one of the best mic men ever, Ric Flair.  If you haven’t seen these two yet, finish this column, then check out the below clip of Lethal imitating Flair.  It is spot on and it is hilarious.  When the two of them go at it on the mic, you see Lethal, a young guy who just seems to genuinely love his job, matching up with a guy literally twice his age and a wrestling legend.

This brings me to why I continue to watch and why you should too.

I’m not suggesting you should watch because of the older guys like Hogan, Flair, Sting, Nash, and Angle.  I’m also not suggesting that you should watch for guys like Hardy, RVD, Mr. Anderson, Abyss, and AJ Styles, who aren’t the youngest, but have been around the block a few times.  In fact, I’m not even suggesting you should watch for TNA’s crop of younger guys like Wolfe, Lethal, Hernandez, Morgan and the Pope.

What I will suggest, as a reason to watch, is the way that TNA has really begun to tie all of those groups together.  Lethal and Flair are working together about as well as any two wrestlers could, let alone the fact that one is a decades long veteran and the other is a guy who is barely able to vote.  Kevin Nash and Eric Young are a very enjoyable tag team matching size with speed, on top of youth with experience.  Kurt Angle is “working his way back up” and in doing so is having great matches with some very young talent.  When one adds to these the very intriguing matching of opposites – Mr. Anderson and Jeff Hardy – and a crowd pop for RVD that would make even the most casual fan cheer his entrance, you have the makings of a solid two hours of entertainment each week.

Are there areas for improvement?  Absolutely, and in coming columns I’ll discuss some of them.  However, the focus of this column is to pique your interest.  I don’t anticipate that I’ve created any converts today, but hopefully it has served as a good introduction between us and maybe, just maybe, it’s intrigued you enough to check out the show next Thursday, and of course, my column next week.

Until then, I’ll just give you one last reason – Lacey Von Erich.  See you next week.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Columns Articles

more articles »

REALLY?!?!?! with CB – The Summer of Live Impact, Starring ZOMG Brooke Hogan!!!!

Interinactivity: 05.18.2012 – Brock Lesnar, John Cena, & Hulk Hogan

REALLY?!?!?! with CB - 3-Hour Monday Night Raw is ZZZZzzzzz

The Stomping Ground: Shotgun Booking + Brock Lesnar = Catastrophe?

David Roberts

view profile »
  • Chris Biscuiti

    Welcome to the party David. Great first effort, too.

  • Dave O aka Tested Testys

    Dave the man, good work.

    I watch TNA hoping for a PG-13/ MA rating. Wrestling is entertainment, bottom line. WWE is so PG painted these days, Even with the wack ass nxt invasion led by some british grandfatherd in the business..

    TNA is pushing limits, and i like that.. i heard paul heyman is coming in to revamp the creative side of things. vince russuo is played out. (Yes vince, you are.. take a break for 3 years and figure out a new style, or go back couple of years and re do it)

    I hope for the best, and look forward to your post’s.

    Tna the new Ecw? explain

  • S D

    sorry to say.. but the cool kids aren’t watching RAW much these days… so much for the longest episodic idiotic mornoic program in television history!!! I’m one of those that’s Pulling for TNA, even though they have plenty of issues they need to work out.. there’s got to be some professional wrestling show to watch these days.. shouldn’t there?? Any show???

  • Alex

    Hey Dave i really liked your column. i feel like you are just a pro wrestling not mark or what ever they call it. i look forward to reading your columns in the future.

    Alex E Perez

  • Jamal

    I’m glad you like TNA. Good for you, man.

  • incognito

    Nice column Dave. I do wonder what you mean about Nash jobbing though…the only time the guy ever loses, its in a tag match and he gets his partner to take the pin. He wouldn’t even put over Foley, much less an up-and-comer who really needs it, or the popcorn guy who could use the publicity.

  • Scott

    You are right Dave, TNA is brilliant. It has some great matches, great wrestlers and is starting to push the envelope that the family friendly WWE can’t do. The show does need improvement regarding storylines and the flow of the show because Russo is an idiot but Hayman should be the man to put this right

  • defon


    Dave the man, good work.

    I watch TNA hoping for a PG-13/ MA rating. Wrestling is entertainment, bottom line. WWE is so PG painted these days, Even with the wack ass nxt invasion led by some british grandfatherd in the business..

    TNA is pushing limits, and i like that.. i heard paul heyman is coming in to revamp the creative side of things. vince russuo is played out. (Yes vince, you are.. take a break for 3 years and figure out a new style, or go back couple of years and re do it)

    I hope for the best, and look forward to your post’s.

    Tna the new Ecw? explain

    THATS MY LINE!

  • Roadrunner23

    Saying TNA needs improvement is an understatement in my view…

    but I’m a die hard fan and watch roh, tna and wwe every week and will continue to do.

    And I will continue reading your column

  • http://pulsewrestling.com Matthew Michaels

    I’ve definitely seen improvements in TNA and you’re 100% right about RVD’s entrance. It’s a little thing, but it works.

  • Raffi Shamir

    Welcome Dave, that’s an excellent column.

  • Chris Biscuiti

    You know what I find interesting about TNA right now: they are putting on great house shows (from what I hear) and entertaining TV shows since the switch back from Monday nights.

    Their biggest weakness, unfortunately, is giving away most of their PPV-worthy matches on TV, and leaving nothing for the PPVs themselves.

    If they could fix that, they can make more money. And if they can make more money, they can expand house shows and also have more TV/PPV events away from the Impact Zone.

    I am also pulling for TNA to do well, and I’m glad I’m not the only one in the IWC who feels that way. Thanks again, Dave!

  • David Roberts

    Thanks for the feedback folks. In reading through them there were a couple questions for me to answer.

    1) re: Nash jobbing. I see your point about the past. What I am primary referring to is post heel turn after Hogan-Bischoff entered the picture and I’m including his tag matches. If you looked at how “the Band” got their wins, it was very rarely with any legitimacy. I realize the heels generally win through some sort of “out” for the face, but most of these were barely even matches and their loses were true beat downs. Some of this, I suspect was because of Hall’s physical condition, so I’m hoping perhaps things will turn a bit now. For a heel to have any true buzz, I feel they have to have some legitimacy. I wasn’t seeing that. Hope to in the future.

    2) TNA = the new ECW, you may have a point here. ECW became popular because it pushed the envelope in ways WWF and WCW were not. With admittedly different circumstances, one could make the argument that is happening again.

  • Pingback: Tna » Change to TNA Creative Team, More Coming? - FanHouse

Blowing Up Blogs

Recent Comments

Search Pulse

Author:

Zone:

Category:

wwe
tna
So, with this Simple Jquery Modal Window, it can be in any shapes you want! Simple and Easy to modify : )