To Be Determined – One Year Later
by Raffi Shamir on January 3, 2011

Exactly one year ago today, the entire wrestling world was buzzing with anticipation for what was billed as “The New Monday Night Wars”. TNA was set for the debut of Hulk Hogan on a live Monday night special edition of Impact and WWE was promoting the return of one of the most tragic figures in wrestling, Bret “Hitman” Hart. One year later, it’s time to look back on 4 January 2010 and what kind of effect it had on the business.

TNA billed Hulk Hogan’s arrival as (another) new beginning for the company. Hogan was set to turn the company over and make it number 1. At least that’s what he promised. But Hogan did not come alone. I don’t think anyone thought he’d arrive without his usual followers in Eric Bischoff, Scott Hall and Sean Waltman. Mr. Anderson, Jeff Hardy and Ric Flair were not big surprises either since they were fresh out of their WWE contracts. But I doubt that anyone expected Sean Morley and Orlando Jordan.

That Monday night TNA scored big on the ratings front, which gave them the illusion that they can compete with WWE on a permanent basis. Sadly, moving Impact to Monday nights proved to be an epic failure and they were forced to go back to Thursdays with their tail tucked between their legs. The fallout from the Monday nights experiment is still felt as Impact’s rating has not bounced back to late 2009 levels.

But the ratings don’t tell the entire story. TNA closed 2009 on a high note with one of their best ever creative periods. 2010 saw them took a huge fall on that department. They lost Daniels (Not before he jobbed to Morley), made Joe irrelevant, turned AJ Styles into a midcarder, put Eric Bischoff in dozens of segments each show, did not show character consistency from one week to another, brought ECW has-beens for a failed reunion show and a weak stable, took the title off RVD in the worst way possible, created Fortune – a stable that for months was probably the worst stable in recent years, put their title on Jeff Hardy knowing that he’s facing criminal charges that could send him to prison, the list goes on and on and on (Did I mention THEY yet?)…

TNA had one bright spot this year – the terrific feud between Beer Money and Motor City Machineguns. But it’s hard for to think of other aspects of TNA that made their shows worth watching. If only TNA could turn the clock back one year and erase 2010 from their books, I think this would have been their best option. Sadly, it seems like Dixie Carter is still buying everything that Hogan and Bischoff sell her, so I don’t expect the situation to change anytime soon.

Over on WWE Raw, everyone was waiting for the arrival of Bret Hart. Years after the biggest screwjob in wrestling history, Hart patched things up Vince McMahon and made his triumphant return to WWE. It started the best way possible, with one of the biggest markout moments anyone could imagine – Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels not only shaking hands but hugging in the middle of the ring. If this was the only thing that Bret Hart did in 2010, it was worth it.

But it wasn’t. We also got the obligatory feud with Vince McMahon. If they had done a straight forward feud, it would have been fine. But they actually managed to screw up even a feud that so easy to pull off. It was just like the WCW invasion – rather than going the simple route WWE made things complicated. Involving Batista and John Cena, taking all kinds of wild turns that made it seem like any other feud rather than a feud 13 years in the making.

And then there was the WrestleMania match. I don’t think that Bret Hart himself would want to remember this Wrestlemania moment. He was so out of shape, so unprepared that it was embarrassing. At one point he couldn’t even stand up anymore that he grabbed a chair and sat down to catch his breath. This was arguably one of the lowest points of Bret’s career. He didn’t really need to have a match, there were other ways for Bret to get his revenge on Vince McMahon at Wrestlemania without trying to have a proper match. However, by not realizing his limitations, Bret Hart was not even a shadow of his former self and hurt his legacy. Fortunately, Hart was able to redeem himself with his brief appearance at SummerSlam, but in 2010, Hart will be remembered not as the Excellence of Execution, but as the guy who had to sit down in the middle of his match.

Exactly one year later, Bret Hart is nowhere to be seen in WWE. He had his moment and moved on. One year later, the destructive fingerprints of Hulk Hogan and his cohorts are all over the TNA product. Last year TNA and WWE promoted the first TV shows of 2010 by bringing back the greatest stars from the past. This year WWE is promoting the first Raw of 2011 with a WWE Championship match between The Miz and John Morrison – the future of the company. TNA also have what they need to take us to the future of Wrestling, they just need to decide to do it, like WWE did.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Columns Articles

more articles »

REALLY?!?!?! with CB – The Summer of Live Impact, Starring ZOMG Brooke Hogan!!!!

Interinactivity: 05.18.2012 – Brock Lesnar, John Cena, & Hulk Hogan

REALLY?!?!?! with CB - 3-Hour Monday Night Raw is ZZZZzzzzz

The Stomping Ground: Shotgun Booking + Brock Lesnar = Catastrophe?

Raffi Shamir

view profile »
  • CB

    Great job Raffi. I agree 100% with everything you said.

  • sideshowbob

    TNA had good women matches the first half of the year too. But alas, that too has failed.

  • Michael L

    It is amazing how much the WWE is looking towards building the future, while TNA continues to look towards the past–and not even its own past. I’d be happy if they’d look to its own past by pushing Joe and Styles, but instead, they’re stuck in the 00′s with RVD and Hardy as the most recent champions. This is what killed WCW to a large extent, and it will be what kills TNA.

  • incognito

    Good points, made, but your conclusion was a bit one-sided. WWE’s champion is currently locked in a feud with an announcer in his sixties. He even lost a match to him. Hogan hasn’t been on TNA TV in weeks, and thanks to his back surgery, may still not be around for quite some time.

    Also, part of the Monday night failure has to be attributed to Spike TV. They have their best rating ever, then follow that up by going back to Thursday, which was never announced on the show. To make matters worse, Thursday’s episode is a replay. After another Thursday show, they go back to Mondays. Jumping around like that is going to cost you some of your audience…it happened to Smackdown, TNA is not immune. Then they only went live every other week. Each week the show was taped, the rating dropped. It would rise, but not as high, on the next live show. If they’d have gone all in from the beginning, live every week on Mondays, they might still be going on Mondays…although they certainly wouldn’t have overtaken Raw, they might have improved their numbers.

    I also believe, in spite of the stupidity of bringing in Morley and the Nasty Boys, it should be mentioned that for once Hogan resisted the urge to bring in Beefcake.

  • Raffi Shamir

    @Chris – thanks

    @incognito – Yes, my conclusion is one sided but I still stand by it. WWE started 2010 with Sheamus as champion, and while he did not have legitimacy last year, he ended the year as a true main event superstar. The turned Miz into a main eventer, John Morrison is once again getting a push, and this tume it looks real. Theye even gave Swagger the title for a brief period, though that was an epic failure and I hope in the future he will get a a real chance at the top. Add to that Daniel Bryan and Nexus and this was a good building year for WWE, not including the Kaval release (Read Andy’s latest FYC – http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2011/01/03/for-your-consideration%e2%80%a6the-raw-judicial-review-for-1311/ for a better explanation).
    TNA on the other hand put the title this year on two former WWE champions and had AJ Styles play second chair to Ric Flair. People are raving over Matt Morgan’s recent push but he’s basically in the same position today that he was a year ago (The only difference is that last year he lost to Kurt Angle and this year he lost to Jeff Hardy). I truly believe that 2010 was one of the worst years for TNA, espcially after 2009 which was one of their better years.
    As for the numbers decline – yes, there are many reasons, but it was still Bischoff and Hogan who pushed for the Monday move, thinking the company was ready for this while it clearly wasn’t. Everything that followed is a result of this initial decision.

  • EWF_X29

    Good column Raffi. I think for a guy who self admittedly doesn’t like TNA I think that was a pretty fair sum up of TNA. It was a lousy year and the future prospects of TNA are basically the same guys who have been there for a few years now. It’s now or never for TNA. If they are in the same position in a year from now you will see Vince in the middle of the ring crowing about how he crushed TNA and how their purchase proves what a genius he is and on the Titantron HHH will enter the Impact Zone and say he has beat Vince to the purchase and that he owns TNA. Happy 2011.

  • incognito

    2009 was a pretty bad year for TNA in my opinion up until Bound For Glory. People seem to forget that because the last three months were so great.

  • Sebastian Howard

    I tried watching TNA again, I reallly did. I turned it on and Mick Foley and Flair were having a good promo. I thought this is good. I continued to watch and saw a sutpid scene with Jeff and Matt Morgan where the camera kept on zooming in on their hands for some reason but it wasn’t that bad. The JJ came out to do an MMA match, I changed the channel and havn’t looke back. Anyway great column!

  • incognito

    You missed Jarrett training the kids?? That’s too bad.

Blowing Up Blogs

Recent Comments

Search Pulse

Author:

Zone:

Category:

wwe
tna
So, with this Simple Jquery Modal Window, it can be in any shapes you want! Simple and Easy to modify : )